What's So Funny About Peace, Love and Solidarity?
I'm going to be upfront with you: If I were you, I wouldn't believe a word of what I'm about to tell you.
My boyfriend, Damian, and I had just finished dinner at Elmo with our friends Greg and Chad when we exited onto Seventh Avenue. Elmo is one of the last true gay bastions of what was once the epicenter of gay life in New York City, which still has a high gay population even if its restaurants and bars have become more gentrified.
Having been followed home from school and taunted as a child, I immediately revert to my standard reaction. Do not engage.
STONEWALL 25
Top: Rafael and Kenneth (a passerby called us "rugby boys in love")
Bottom: With Rafael and our friends Fred and Pedro at pre-march breakfast. I told the waitress I wanted sourdough toast to which she replied: "White, wheat or rye, honey? This ain't California."
I spent much of the past few years looking forward to the 50th anniversary of Stonewall. If you had told me at Stonewall 25 that gay people could marry, openly serve in the military and legitimately run for president a quarter century later, I'd have laughed -- or maybe started crying -- in your face. But Stonewall 50 took on even more meaning after the 2016 elections, now that it is happening against the backdrop of one of the darkest times in our country's history, where our hard-earned gains are literally being stripped from us on a regular basis. (Clarence Thomas hinted that even marriage equality is on the table, and I believe it.) I was sure we would unite for this special occasion on a level that was deeper than ever before.
In case you couldn't tell it was 1994: Pleated shorts and Timberlands
Instead, it seems many have decided to use this moment as a way to flaunt how intellectually superior they believe they are. If they're not constantly letting it be known that they're not "falling" for the official Pride events -- because being shunned by corporations is apparently more desirable than being courted and acknowledged by them -- then they are waving their woke flags to let us know that they believe everything we thought we knew about the LGBTQ rights movement is tainted.
Everybody loves a parade
I was not at Stonewall. And because of the AIDS epidemic that followed, very few people who were there are with us now.
But from historian and activist Martin Duberman's definitive "Stonewall" book -- where I first learned about Sylvia Rivera -- to contemporaneous news photos and articles from The Daily News, New York Times, Village Voice and Newsweek, there is nothing but a consistent story of a diverse group of LGBTQ people, one that was reflective of the city's demographics at the time.
This is not a gotcha. I'm just not really sure why the post-AIDS crisis generation thinks it's an affront to acknowledge that it was a brilliant joint effort of many diverse people that led the LGBTQ movement to where it is today. (Even if the photos and historians are somehow wrong and the Stonewall uprising consisted primarily of minorities and transgender people, there’s still no denying the contributing efforts of Henry Gerber, Frank Kameny, Barbara Gittings, Dick Leitsch and the countless members of the pre-Stonewall Society for Human Rights and Mattachine Society.) Yet it seems that somewhere along the way shining a light on some underappreciated heroes turned into rewriting history. (The youngsters started it, and now the wokest of the cis white men have run with it.) But even well-intentioned overcorrecting can have unintended consequences. People who have misconstrued recent emphasis on certain figures have done such a good job of instilling fear in people that even Barnard College professor Jennifer Finney Boyland felt the need to include a Stonewall anecdote about Marsha P. Johnson -- that even Marsha says isn't true -- in one of her recent New York Times columns. (I'll bet David France -- who made a film about Johnson starring a trans woman of color -- can tell you why Boyland did it.)
So it's not a huge leap to think it's what made that young man go off on me for no reason, and what has made countless other young activists unnecessarily aggrieved. (I’ve now lived in gay ghettos for three decades and the only time I’ve ever been harassed is by a gay guy.) Why are we doing this to ourselves? I'm almost beginning to think young queers are somehow envious that the older set had life-and-death issues to fight for -- and it's really starting to piss me off. (If you're taking offense to any of this, might I suggest you read "The Older Generation to Young Gay Men: Why the Fuck Are You Complaining" by Katie Herzog or watch Episode 4 of the "Tales of the City" reboot.) While what happened Friday night isn't much in the big scheme of things, it certainly seems to be reflective of what's going on throughout the LGBTQ community. (Just spend five minutes on social media.) Of course it's important to raise new perspectives. But they should not be capricious and at the expense of what we've achieved. Despite what you may have heard, we’re still in this fight together.
UPDATE:
Written by Newsweek’s Dan Avery after reading my post.
<< Home